Archive for October, 2008

30
Oct

Ross and Brand affair

   Posted by: Steve    in General

The country has erupted because a couple of comedians took a joke too far on a radio show. A radio show that was pre-recorded and available for moderation, I might add.

It took the top slot on Sky News and co, prompting me to wonder if there really was no other news available. Everyone’s bored of the financial crisis. The US attack on Syria has been forgotten. But Brand’s tasteless remarks about Andrew Sach’s granddaughter is now the top most newsworthy story. No news is indeed good news.

I would like to point out that although you don’t go around telling her grandfather in a lewd way, Brand did have a relationship with this poor woman that probably involved sex. She now claims her life is ruined. She must be gutted. I can’t even remember her name and can’t be bothered to look. Don’t worry, love, you’ll be forgotten in a couple of short weeks. It’s certainly lucky she knew someone at the Sun newspaper through whom she could tell her horrific life destroying tale – presumably in case some people didn’t know her or what she’d been through. Is she not now destroying her own life? Is this suicide? Is the newspaper going to get dragged through the courts for assisted suicide?

Brand has resigned – perhaps this is the best outcome for him as his semi-notorious reputation is now resident in the Halls of Notoriety – right up their with Johnny Rotten (John Lydon) and Freddie Starr. Lydon, formally of the Sex Pistols, is a property developer and can be seen advertising butter on television in case you’d forgotten about him.

Ross is the subject of an emergency meeting at the BBC to discuss his future, whilst being currently suspended from working. I hope he is on full pay whilst this enforced. He has a family and might well have a mortgage or two or three or four to pay. It could create another credit crunch if he goes down. His £6m a year salary will probably crop up during the executive’s discussions, I would assume.

Has the world gone mad … again? Brand is a rude comic, always on the edge. Ross is a bit more polished but has always been risqué. If you found their material offensive, you wouldn’t listen to the programme, would you? That’s probably borne out by the one or two complaints at the time of the broadcast, which (given subsequent publicity) has now risen to 30,000 or so. I would guess that 29,998 of those did not hear the original broadcast. If no one has said anything, no one would have known or cared.

“It’s license payers money!” they scream. Yes it is, but I don’t remember signing a legally binding contract with the BBC for them to produce only material that I like. The stuff that I don’t like – which is most of it – I don’t watch. The fact I have to pay for the license is only a fact and is the law. It’s an unfair law in my opinion, but a law all the same.

It was offensive (to Sachs senior – I suspect the young lady was glad of some publicity at first) and it did cross the line. The BBC should’ve intercepted and stopped the programme being broadcast. They didn’t. Should someone have reviewed it before it went out? Yes, of course. The two comics apologised. That should be it. The rest is just bored news hacks stirring up news where there is none. Turn it in. It’s boring.

28
Oct

The “R” word

   Posted by: Steve    in General

I just want to say something else about the economy, then I’ll shut up about it all.

The “R” word – recession – it happens. It happens in cycles every 10-20 or so years.

There’s a lot been made of the “boom and bust” cycle that Gordon Brown promised to eradicate. That was irresponsble of him to promise that. He probably thought that we would hit the “bust” part as the Labour government got replaced by the Conservatives. It might well have been true if he hadn’t bottled taking on a general election just after becoming Prime Minister (and becoming a completely unelected leader in the process). I guess that finally getting to sit in Tony’s big chair went to his head and his ego took over. He is left with the mess that he originally hoped to bequeath to the Tories, albeit by the process of a natural economic cycle and not a deliberate ploy. Don’t be fooled by “Gordon the Saviour” – him chucking money at the problem will only make the problem last longer as taxes are pushed up to cope. He was a political dead man walking and this was a desperate act of a desperate man. He was also an advocate of a nationalised banking system in his strong socialist past, which would stiffle London’s edge as a top financial centre. It’s his legacy and will hang around our necks for years to come.

Boom and bust is normal. The economy grows, and then grows faster as people naturally try to expand themselves (and their earnings) – that’s why interest rates go up to try to stop it. People form companies in good times and borrow money to do so – the banks are happy to lend more and more to maximise their own profits and increase the returns to shareholders. Unemployment sinks (as there are more companies and jobs) and everyone is happy. The banks made more this time by packaging up these loans and selling them as investments (fixed income returns on debt repayments). Then, as always, all of a sudden everyone stops, says “sh*t!” and the confidence drains from the economy instantly as they realise the money isn’t real. Everyone withdraws their investments for safety – and stocks plunge, making a bad problem worse – and everything plummets. The businesses struggle – customers disappear as they have little or no money. The companies go bust. “Correction” is the word. Then we hit the bottom – which is a great buying opportunity for investors and then there are huge opportunities for business to grow into the space that the now expanding economy offers. The governments then want to encourage lending again to get the economy moving. Thus, the cycle starts again.

How do you stop it? If the Bank of England sets the interest rates at a level that encourages gentle growth without irresponsible borrowing – this is a good start.

Chances of getting that right? None. It’s human nature to want to push onwards and to take risks. If it wasn’t, we’d all still be living in caves.

We’re on the “bust” part right now – you’ll likely see some more in your lifetime, just like your parents and their parents before them. Comforting factors are that a) it always recovers and b) the media always makes it sound worse than it is – they sell newspapers off the panic – especially in this intense media age.

28
Oct

Bankers

   Posted by: Steve    in General

Some people somewhere are making a lot of money out of the current financial crisis. The market goes up and down – it’s “volatile” – and if you know what you are doing, or more importantly know of (or start) the small pieces of information that makes the market go up and down, then you can play the markets and make lots of money. The market always goes up and down (generally upwards – and it will again), but currently, it goes up and down by 5% or more. 6% is what you would normally expect to make on your fund (an endowment, a pension plan, a managed ISA) in a year. You can make this almost every day at the moment if you know if it goes up or down. 50/50, I hear you say? No, it isn’t. People in the market “in the know” do know if it will crash or “rally”. They do, trust me.

The men at the top are going to have their bonuses and pay controlled, we are told. If this happens, the men at the top will simply go abroad or stop. (they already have lots of money, remember, and they are people “in the know” (see para above), so they won’t get bored). The government own big chunks of these banks and want to sell their shares at a profit. Will they do that if the banks are over-controlled and have the senior execs jumping ship and running off to Dubai (a new financial centre, which is now rubbing its hands and finishing off all the new gleaming offices, ready to house these execs)? No, the government doesn’t want these white elephants. Expect the banks to reposses your house to get the money in, that they have to repay to the government – who took it from you in the first place. Expect the government to quietly sell the equity back to the original owners in the first place (your pension funds) at a loss (when the bank has taken your homes), on the banker’s terms. After all, the bankers are smarter than the politicians – that’s why they’re bankers.

Simple, really.